The results pinpointed some positives and promise, while shining a spotlight on even more opportunities for improvement — some of which are glaring. Some examples of the good, the bad and the ugly practices uncovered by the report:
The good:
--The vast majority of centers recognize the importance of call monitoring.
--Most centers formally reward/recognize agents who consistently meet or exceed key objectives.
--Most centers correlate employee reward/recognition with improved service quality, higher customer satisfaction and greater agent morale/job satisfaction.
The bad:
--The majority of centers rely on internal quality monitoring, rather than external customer surveys, to measure customer satisfaction.
--Only two in five centers bother to measure agent satisfaction.
--One in four centers have no disaster recovery or business continuity plan in place.
And the ugly:
--In nearly three out of four centers, leaders are rarely held accountable for agent retention.
--Only 39% measure first-call resolution (FCR), considered one of the most important contact center metrics.
--One in three contact centers surveyed do not measure customer satisfaction.
More information on customer care can be found at http://www.supportindustry.com/
1 comment:
I must agree that doing your surveys in-house tends to be a bad idea. Surveying is much more of a science than people realize. Not everyone can do it.
Post a Comment